Unless you
have no friendships and/or biological connections with other people (it
happens), there will come a point where you will find yourself in a place where
you will have to introduce friends or family members to your philosopher. As
with any other non-philosopher, the meeting (s) could go pretty well or
terribly.
With
philosophers, you have the added “bonus” of nervousness making them do things
like attack (verbally) or appear super-arrogant. It’s not like they try to
screw up all of your relationships with your friends and/or family; they
sometimes just get out of control when they’re nervous.
It’s
important to remember through the meeting process that your philosopher is not a monster: your philosopher is nervous and
needs a little bit of direction and intervention to help the meeting(s) go
smoothly.
Here are
some things to look out for in friend/family meetings:
1. The Licking of Chops
It is likely
that your friend and/or family member will say something that your philosopher
really wants to challenge (i.e. “Politics is always stupid”). Even though your
philosopher cares about you, your philosopher is likely to lose themselves in
the moment. You will see that glint—you know, the one that says “You just
tossed me an easy/fun/tasty morsel of an argument point to immediately
challenge”—and you will see them itching to open their mouths and attack. If
you do not intervene at this point, things will get either very awkward or very
uncomfortable immediately.
2. Research Project Talk
Do not let
your philosopher talk about their research projects. They will be tempted to do
so because your friend/family member will probably ask them a question about it
and it is very easy to slip into talk about one’s own projects. Because your
philosopher is nervous, she/he is likely to talk way too long and in way too
much depth for your unassuming friend/family member to understand. This will
make your friend/family member feel stupid and will make it appear as if your
philosopher was trying to make them feel this way. Now, it is important to note that your
philosopher may already have a spiel for explaining their projects to various
groups of non-philosophers. [My philosopher has at least four distinct spiels].
It’s safe for your philosopher to give
this [and it’s kind of fun to identify which spiel they might use in certain circumstances],
but don’t let them add anything beyond the spiel.
3. Playing Philosophy Games
Some
non-philosophers have no problem with playing a few philosophy games (e.g.
games including shaving barbers, environmentally destructive CEOs, Chinese
rooms, trolley cars, etc) . My family is actually really great about playing
along. Some people, though, are really annoyed with philosophy games.
Philosophy games make them feel stupid, which makes them feel like your
philosopher is trying to make them feel stupid. It is best to discourage your
philosopher from attempting philosophy games until your friends/family are more comfortable with
your philosopher and know that they are anything but arrogant (your
philosophers are all little angels—like mine—I’m sure).
So, now that
you know what to look out for, how do you carefully lead your philosopher in
the peaceful and harmonious direction? Here are some methods that I have found
super-effective:
1. Talk to your philosopher beforehand
Simple, right?
No really, talk through the meeting(s) with your philosopher before your
meeting(s). Remind your philosophers of what could happen if they are not on
their guard. Warn them that you will be redirecting if necessary.
2. Make a list of safe topics
My
philosopher and I will often brainstorm some safe things to talk to new people
about. You can often suggest that your philosopher talk about a book that they
are reading which relates to something else a friend/family member is
interested in or a news story (beware of politics, though) or a non-philosophy
interest. If all else fails, offer to be
the conversation-director.
3. Interrupt and Redirect in Hazardous Waters
Really, you’re
going to think I’m being rude and unkind here, but sometimes the best thing
that you can do for your philosopher and/or the friend or family member is to
interrupt the conversation and redirect it onto something else. You’ve seen
your philosopher in philosophy-mode. Philosophers are often unaware at that
moment that they way they are behaving could be interpreted as being unkind or
rude to a non-philosopher. When your philosopher looks back at that
conversation later, she/he will usually be very grateful that you saved them
from the hazards (if they don’t see this and/or aren’t grateful, then your
philosopher probably never sees when they are broaching being interpreted as
rude or unkind. I’m sorry. There are philosophers like this out there).
Philosophers
sometimes forget what it is like to be a non-philosopher. Hopefully, they will
trust your judgment and wow your friends/family. Your friends/family will also
hopefully reach the sort of level with your philosopher where she/he can play
their little philosopher games and engage them in philosophical discussions
without hurt feelings and alienation on all sides. And isn’t it cool that you
get to be the emissary of philosophers everywhere by making the other
non-philosophers in your life realize that philosophers are pretty great?
~The
Philosiologist~
You can follow me on twitter
(@philosiologist), friend me on facebook (Philosiologist Qed), or add me to a
circle on Google+ (Philosiologist). Feel free to email me with questions and/or
comments, too. I try to answer emails in a decent amount of time, but sometimes
(due to various elements, the largest one being my forgetfulness) I put off
emailing for a while. Don’t’ be discouraged: I will get back to you!
[annoyingphilosopher]
ReplyDeleteI think you meant to write "e.g." instead of "i.e.".
[/annoyingphilosopher]
I really love your blog and am happy whenever you post something new. I'm still an undergrad philosopher coming to terms with how I should interact with others without seeming arrogant. Your blog adds humor to my reflections. :)
ReplyDelete-MH
Good post! I recognised a lot of my younger self in there. I like to think that these days I handle social situations fairly well, but I'm not sure how far others might agree with that assessment.
ReplyDeleteI would just like to highlight the fact that not all philosophers are as socially inept as this particular post would seem to indicate.
ReplyDeleteWow. Life with my husband philosopher to a T. Scary.
ReplyDeletea great post would be things not to say to a philosopher (you mentioned one--politics is dumb or politics is great etc.) but some of my favorites that just make me groan and not know what to say:
ReplyDelete(Oh that's nice. I have a philosophy myself. want to hear it?)
That's just one. You've done a great job preparing your philosopher for these events. How about telling us what you say when your family asks you about your philosopher. How do you prepare them?
Terrific post! Two things come immediately to mind for me:
ReplyDelete1) Every philosopher should develop a nice (ideally entertaining) spiel about their projects, reasons for being a philosopher, etc. It makes you a great (reads not tedious) dinner guest. In fact, wouldn't it be amazing if there was someplace where philosophers could deposit favorite spiels online for wider distribution?
2) I encourage anyone who would like to learn what a good (i.e. cheeky) spiel should look like
go to Youtube and type in "Three Minute Philosophy," you might disagree with the content but the style and delivery is spot on.
I have been reading your blog for about a year now, and I love it. My boyfriend of almost two years is a Philosophy professor, so I really appreciate what you are doing. This post really hit the spot.
ReplyDelete